Financial Crises in Currency Board Systems

In recent years economists have done much work assembling information on episodes of financial crisis. In particular, Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff’s 2009 book This Time is Different elevated the study of the issue to a new level by combining a wide-ranging survey with intensive data collection.

Because the subject is so large, work remains to be done on it. Miloni Madan and Alec Maki, two undergraduates at Johns Hopkins University, have made a useful contribution with a just-issued working paper that for the first time examines all currently known financial crises that have occurred in currency board systems. Madan and Maki wrote the paper for a class offered by CFS Special Counselor Steve Hanke. The working paper is from the Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and Study of Business Enterprise, which Hanke co-directs and which has a link to the CFS. Because of my interest in monetary history, I read the paper in draft and offered comments on it as it developed into an ambitious project.

Madan and Maki bring to light a few financial crises not previously discussed by economists who have gathered cross-country data. There may be other episodes yet to be uncovered relating to currency boards, but it seems unlikely there will be many other important ones. Given how widespread currency boards have been historically, it is remarkable how few crises currency board systems have experienced. Crises have been concentrated in Argentina, Hong Kong, and Eastern Europe.

From China: It’s the “Never Befores,” Stupid…

I was delighted to speak at the Stronger Global Economic Growth Conference held in Shanghai this past weekend.  My remarks focused on the vital – yet poorly understood – space at the intersection of financial markets and the global economy.

Today, growth is constrained by three “never befores”:

– Large scale intervention by central banks (new CFS Divisia data reveal counter-intuitive trends),
– A swell in the size of the financial regulatory apparatus,
– Distortions across a wide range of markets.

We address each and offer solutions.  The result would be reduction in the drain on growth as well as opening new possibilities for international monetary coordination.

For the full remarks:
http://centerforfinancialstability.org/speeches/Shanghai_022816.pdf

Central bank policy is founded on flawed analysis

Professor Michael Wickens (University of York and Cardiff Business School) publishes a thoughtful letter in the Financial Times “Central bank policy is founded on flawed analysis” – http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/44f54316-d0c3-11e5-92a1-c5e23ef99c77.html#axzz40FPPhp2x

Professor Wickens illustrates how assumptions underpinning monetary policy actions actually damage financial stability.

Center for Financial Stability members and friends know how our Advances in Monetary and Financial Measurement (AMFM) data developed under the leadership of Professor William A. Barnett illustrate present day challenges to the conduct of monetary management and financial stability.

For instance, Fixing the Fed’s Liquidity Mess – http://www.wsj.com/articles/fixing-the-feds-liquidity-mess-1437435242 – a Wall Street Journal piece that I wrote with Stephen Dizard highlights the specific challenge to financial stability from illiquid markets.  We offer three solutions.

 

CFTC Commissioner Giancarlo Discusses 6 Mega-Trends Facing Financial Markets

CFTC Commissioner J. Christopher Giancarlo identified 6 mega-trends facing 21st century financial markets. His comments were drawn from a guest lecture delivered on December 1, 2015 at Harvard Law School and recently released in a podcast.

Commissioner Giancarlo identified the following “overarching challenges”:

Cyber threats. “Unfortunately, cyber-hostilities will not end any time soon. They will be relentless for . . . years to come. As mega-trends go, cyber-risk is the number one threat to 21st century financial markets. . . . As market leaders and regulators, we must make it our first priority in time and attention. We must leave no step untaken or precaution unavailed to thwart cyber-destruction of the world’s financial markets.”

Disruptive technology. “[E]xponential digital technologies are rapidly changing the very nature of human identity, work, leisure and society. . . . The only effective way for a regulatory agency to stay abreast of the rapid advances of trading automation is to be informed through an ongoing, bottom-up process.”

Giancarlo voiced the following concerns regarding proposed rules for the registration and regulation of automated trading: “First, the apparent window-dressing of requiring risk controls and testing that are already widely adopted by industry. Second, the high cost and burdens the rule places on small market participants. And third, the rule’s inconsistencies regarding what firms must comply with it.”

Central bank (government) intervention. “[The Federal Reserve] has become the multi-trillion dollar ‘Washington Whale’. . . . The Fed is having an increasingly direct and immediate impact on [all] markets, from corporate bonds to equities and foreign exchange rates, to developing nations’ sovereign debt.  It has reduced the heterogeneity of the investor base, herding it into one-way bets on anticipated changes in Fed policy rather than traditional fundamental credit or value analysis.

Market illiquidity. “In trying to stamp out risk, global regulators are instead harming trading liquidity. . . . The question that must be asked is whether the amount of capital bank regulators are causing financial institutions to take out of trading markets is at all calibrated to the amount of capital need to be kept in markets to support market health and durability. I understand how prudential regulators want banks to limit trading capital to limit their insolvency risk. But what is missing is any analysis of how much trading capital is appropriate to limit broad liquidity risk. Those of us with direct responsibility of overseeing financial markets need to ask that question and demand that analysis, even if bank prudential regulators will not. Once again, Dodd-Frank provides no answers.”

Market concentration. “[A] wave of market consolidation has taken place across the financial landscape, concentrating the provision of essential market services to fewer and fewer institutions. . . . Unfortunately, global financial markets are now undergoing a pronounced reduction in the bio-diversity of market service providers, with deleterious effect on market safety and soundness. Market regulators must find a way to reverse this trend, that threatens the systemic safety that Dodd-Frank was meant to preserve.”

Deglobalization. “[T]he 2008 financial crisis and the political and response . . . seems to have reversed the course of financial market globalization. . . . [T]here is a fundamental mismatch between [the CFTC’s swaps trading] regulatory framework and the distinct liquidity and trading dynamics of the global swaps markets. This mismatch, and the application of the framework worldwide, has caused numerous harms, foremost of which is driving away global market participants from transacting with entities subject to CFTC swaps regulation, resulting in fragmented global swaps markets.”

Commissioner Giancarlo concluded: “Regulators and others with responsibility for financial markets must take steps to address these challenges:  prioritize cyber-risk resiliency; foster best practices for new trading technologies; counter the distortions caused by central bank market intervention; acknowledge and address the diminishing liquidity in trading markets; and review and reduce the numerous poorly designed rules and regulations that are causing service-provider concentration and market fragmentation.”

Commissioner Giancarlo delivered his remarks as part of the Fidelity Guest Lecture Series on International Finance at Harvard Law School, which was previously covered in the Cabinet News.

Treasury debt ceiling: Inside the Fed’s `D-Day’ War Games…

Yesterday staff on the House Financial Services Committee released a report critical of Treasury activities during the debt ceiling crisis. Treasury told Congress that the department was unable to prioritize debt payments to keep the government from violating its borrowing limit.

Of course, Treasury had the ability to prioritize payments. Emerging economies have done this for years!

The 322-page report includes documents received under subpoena highlighting table top exercises to precisely prioritize debt payments – http://financialservices.house.gov/uploadedfiles/debt_ceiling_report_final_01292015.pdf.

I am quoted in Bloomberg’s “Inside the Fed’s `D-Day’ War Games for Breach of U.S. Debt Limit” – http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-02-01/inside-the-fed-s-d-day-war-games-for-breach-of-u-s-debt-limit.

U.S. Secular Stagnation?

Johns Hopkins Professor Steve Hanke (CFS, Special Counselor) penned a thoughtful piece on “secular stagnation.”

Steve also meaningfully employs CFS Divisia monetary aggregates to examine future U.S. economic growth prospects.

The full article – U.S. Secular Stagnation? – is available at http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/us-secular-stagnation.

Pulling Away Punch Bowls

Ike Brannon – from Capital Policy Analytics – wrote a review for the Weekly Standard of the recent CFS publication Wall Street, the Federal Reserve and Stock Market Speculation: A Retrospective by Elmus Wicker.

To read the review, click here:http://www.weeklystandard.com/pulling-away-punch-bowls/article/2000251

To read the monograph, click here:http://centerforfinancialstability.org/books/WickerWallStreet20151202.pdf

Professor Steve Hanke discusses the Federal interest rate increase

Steve Hanke, Johns Hopkins Professor of Applied Economics and a CFS Special Counselor, discusses the Federal Reserve’s announcement of the first interest rate increase in ten years.

Professor Hanke emphasizes the relative importance of the broad money supply, which includes that supplied by the private banking system, as measured by the CFS Divisia report of December 16, 2015.  CFS Divisia M4 grew by 4.6% in November 2015 on a year-over-year basis versus 3.4% in October or 2.1% for 2014, a statistic Hanke cited as indicating a “healthy” but “modest” economic growth.

To listen to the podcast, click here:  http://english.cri.cn/7146/2015/12/17/3921s908785.htm

Release – Wall Street, the Federal Reserve and Stock Market Speculation: A Retrospective

Today, the Center for Financial Stability (CFS) is delighted to release Wall Street, the Federal Reserve and Stock Market Speculation: A Retrospective — a new monograph written by Professor Elmus Wicker.

Professor Wicker’s ideas about the Federal Reserve and financial markets are of special interest now, as:

– The Federal Reserve is poised to raise its policy interest rate for the first time since the onset of the Great Recession; and

– Central banks around the world are on the verge of gaining new macroprudential powers.

Wall Street, the Federal Reserve and Stock Market Speculation: A Retrospective provides historical insights on the interplay between the stock market and the Federal Reserve as well as fodder for further study and debate.

We thank Jordan Wicker, Ike Brannon, and Kurt Schuler for help in bringing the manuscript to print.

For the full monograph in electronic format:
http://centerforfinancialstability.org/books/WickerWallStreet20151202.pdf

CFS Discussion on “America’s Bank” with Author Roger Lowenstein…

The Center for Financial Stability (CFS) thanks Roger Lowenstein for “America’s Bank: The Epic Struggle to Create the Federal Reserve.” “America’s Bank” is a gift for anyone interested in understanding the nuances and struggles behind the creation of the Federal Reserve.

Perhaps, of greatest importance, “America’s Bank” highlights lessons for today’s Fed stretching from governance to the size of the institution relative to the economy.

We are grateful to Roger Lowenstein for sitting down with CFS.  The following are excerpts from the conversation.

Best regards,
Lawrence Goodman

Lawrence Goodman
President
Center for Financial Stability, Inc.
1120 Avenue of the Americas, 4th floor
New York, NY  10036
lgoodman@the-cfs.org
1 212 626 2660