House Financial Services Committee Holds Hearing: ”Legislation to Reform the Federal Reserve on Its 100-Year Anniversary”

The House Financial Services Committee held a hearing, titled “Legislation to Reform the Federal Reserve on Its 100-year Anniversary,” to discuss, among other things, the Federal Reserve Accountability and Transparency Act (H.R. 5018).

The following witnesses testified:

See: Committee Memorandum; Archived Webcast.

 

Is Inflation Targeting Still Relevant?

In his paper titled “Inflation Targeting: A Monetary Police Regime Whose Time Has Come and Gone,” David Beckworth calls on the Fed to advance beyond inflation targeting.

ABSTRACT

Inflation targeting emerged in the early 1990s and soon became the dominant monetary-policy regime. It provided a much-needed nominal anchor that had been missing since the collapse of the Bretton Woods system. Its arrival coincided with a rise in macroeconomic stability for numerous countries, and this led many observers to conclude that it is the best way to do monetary policy. Some studies show, however, that inflation targeting got lucky. It is a monetary regime that has a hard time dealing with large supply shocks, and its arrival occurred during a period when they were small. Since this time, supply shocks have become larger, and inflation targeting has struggled to cope with them. Moreover, the recent crisis suggests it has also a tough time dealing with large demand shocks, and it may even contribute to financial instability. Inflation targeting, therefore, is not a robust monetary-policy regime, and it needs to be replaced.

ABOUT DAVID BECKWORTH

David Beckworth is a former international economist at the US Department of
the Treasury and the author of Boom and Bust Banking: The Causes and Cures of the Great Recession. His research focuses on monetary policy. Currently he is an assistant professor at Western Kentucky University.

Read the paper at http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Beckworth-Inflation-Targeting.pdf.

Three Governors Sworn in at the FRB

New and ongoing members were sworn in by Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB”) Chair Janet Yellen to serve on the FRB.

The members are as follows:

  • Lael Brainard was sworn in as a new member of the FRB;
  • Jerome H. Powell was sworn in to serve a second term; and
  • Stanley Fischer, who became a member of the FRB on May 28, 2014 to fill an unexpired term, was sworn in to serve as Vice Chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve.

Members of the FRB serve for a term of 14 years. Fischer, Brainard and Powell join Daniel K. Tarullo, whose term expires in 2022, and Chair Janet Yellen, whose four-year term as Chair runs until 2018 and whose term on the FRB runs until 2024.

See: Press Release.

 

Banca d’Italia’s Financial Stability Report

Bank of Italy’s most recent FSR became available earlier this month. Below is the Bank’s summary:

Overview

The global expansion proceeds at moderate and regionally uneven rates – The world economy continues to expand moderately with differing regional performances. In Europe the recovery has also involved the countries hit by the sovereign debt crisis. In some of the emerging economies with structural imbalances, growth has slowed and capital outflows have been recorded.

In Europe financial conditions improve in the countries worst hit by the sovereign debt crisis … Financial conditions in the euro area have improved in the last few months. The reduction in the spread on government securities, which has been more pronounced since last autumn, mainly reflects the subsidence of fears of a break-up of the single currency, thanks to signs of economic recovery, the effects of fiscal consolidation and the introduction of reforms in a number of countries, the Eurosystem’s initiatives and the progress made towards Banking Union.

…but the risks are still considerable – Significant risks remain, especially as regards the evolution of the macro-economic situation. Negative consequences for growth and financial stability in the euro area could come from a worse than expected slowdown in the emerging economies or an unexpectedly protracted period of low inflation. Uncertainties also stem from the geopolitical tensions in various parts of the world, in particular the crisis between Russia and Ukraine. On the other hand, the risk that the less accommodative monetary policy stance in the United States might cause an increase in medium and long-term interest rates in the euro area as well has lessened, although it has not disappeared.

In Italy the slow improvement in the macroeconomic situation continues – In Italy the economic recovery is spreading, but it remains fragile. The real estate market is still weak. House prices are still declining, although the fall in non-residential property prices has come to a halt. Foreign portfolio investment in Italy has increased, both in government securities and private-sector securities. Interest rates have declined on all maturities.

The financial conditions of households are sound … In 2013 households suffered a smaller decline in disposable income than in 2012; there was a reduction in debt and a recovery in investment in financial assets. Low interest rates and measures to support borrowers helped to contain the vulnerability of indebted households. It is estimated that the proportion of financially fragile households would increase by only a modest margin even under adverse macroeconomic scenarios.

… but those of firms are still difficult – Although some positive signs are emerging, the financial conditions of firms remain weak. Several large companies have substituted bonds for part of their bank debt; for smaller firms, difficulties in accessing credit, low liquidity and the uncertainties still surrounding the cyclical upswing will remain the main sources of risk in the coming months.

The Comprehensive Assessment is under way – The Comprehensive Assessment of the largest euro area banks is now in progress. The exercise, in which 15 Italian banks are taking part, will permit uniform comparison of bank balance sheets in different countries, helping to reduce the segmentation of European financial markets still further.

Market assessments of Italian banks improve – In the first few months of the year the markets’ evaluations of Italian banks improved considerably, bringing them nearer to those of banks in the other main euro-area countries.

The contraction in credit eases – The contraction in bank lending abated somewhat at the start of 2014. Qualitative surveys of banks found more favourable conditions for credit to households; the conditions of credit access for firms, though slightly better, remain restrictive.

The deterioration in loan quality slows – The deterioration in banks’ loan asset quality has eased. The flow of new bad debts as a ratio to outstanding loans stabilized in the fourth quarter of 2013, and preliminary data indicate that in the first quarter of 2014 it declined. However, the volume of non-performing loans is still growing.

Loan loss provisions hit profitability but significantly raise coverage ratios – The massive loan loss provisions entered in the banks’ accounts at the end of 2013 completely absorbed operating profits, but at the same time they resulted in a significant rise in coverage ratios. This development was welcomed by the markets and may help to revive the market for non-performing loans. Some large banks have announced initiatives to optimize the management of these exposures. The lowering of banks’ operating costs continued, thanks in part to the rationalization of branch networks.

Banks reduce their sovereign exposure – Beginning in the second half of last year, Italian banks have reduced the volume of their government securities portfolio.

The funding gap narrows and repayment of Eurosystem financing proceeds – The funding gap has been brought back down to the levels registered in the middle of the last decade, and the repayment of Eurosystem financing has continued, albeit unevenly across banks. The largest have stepped up their bond issuance on the international markets, returning to positive net issues.

A number of banks announce capital increases – Italian banks’ capital position deteriorated as a result of the massive loan loss provisions made at the end of 2013. A number of banks have undertaken capital increases for a total of €10 billion. Italian banks’ leverage remains lower than that of other European banks.

Risks in the insurance sector are modest – For insurance companies the risks deriving from the protracted phase of low interest rates are modest, thanks in part to insurers’ prudent policies on guaranteed-yield policies. The main risks for the sector stem from the tenuous economic recovery. The soundness of the leading companies is now being assessed by the European insurance authority.

Liquidity conditions in the financial markets are easier – The liquidity of the Italian financial markets has improved further. The systemic liquidity risk indicator is now at its lowest level ever, reflecting heavier trading on the secondary market in government securities.

Banca d’Italia’s financial stability report can be found on the CFS FSR page.

Eduardo Aninat on Capital Tax Increases and Chilean Growth

CFS Advisory Board member and former Chilean Finance Minister Eduardo Aninat comments on proposed policies in Chile to increase the corporate tax rate from 20% to 35% and to eliminate the FUT. He expresses concern regarding the affects the plan will have on investment and growth and challenges the government to show how it came to the conclusion that investment would be unchanged.

See The Wall Street Journal article by Mary Anastasia O’Grady article titled “Assault on the Chilean Miracle.”

Banque de France 18th Edition Financial Stability Review

Banque de France released its annual financial stability review this month.

“The focus of this 18th edition of the Financial Stability Review (FSR) is macroprudential policies; how they are implemented and their channels of transmission, and the way they interact with other policies, notably microprudential, fiscal and monetary policies.

The onset of the financial crisis and its consequences have led policymakers to take a more macroeconomic approach to financial system supervision, in order to safeguard its solidity and guarantee the financing and growth of the economy.

This 2014 edition of the FSR provides wide ranging views, emanating from most prominent international experts, and is also an opportunity for some of the pioneering countries in this field to share their experiences of macroprudential policy.”

– Macroprudential policies: rationale and objectives

Five questions and six answers about macroprudential policy
Jaime CARUANA and Benjamin H. COHEN, Bank for International Settlements

Governance of macroprudential policy
Klaas KNOT, De Nederlandsche Bank

From tapering to preventive policy
Charles GOODHART, London School of Economics, Financial Markets Group
and Enrico PEROTTI, University of Amsterdam and Centre for Economic Policy Research

Collective action problems in macroprudential policy and the need for international coordination
José VIÑALS and Erlend NIER, International Monetary Fund

A macroprudential perspective on regulating large financial institutions
Daniel K. TARULLO, Federal Reserve System

The impact of macroprudential policy on financial integration
Andreas DOMBRET, Deutsche Bundesbank


– Experiences regarding macro prudential policies

European macroprudential policy from gestation to infancy
Ignazio ANGELONI, European Central Bank

Macroprudential policy in France: requirements and implementation
Anne Le LORIER Banque de France

Implementing macroprudential policies: the Swiss approach
Jean‑Pierre DANTHINE, Swiss National Bank

The effects of macroprudential policies on housing market risks: evidence from Hong Kong
Dong HE, Hong Kong Monetary Authority

Macroprudential policies in Korea – Key measures and experiences
Choongsoo KIM, Bank of Korea

Framework for the conduct of macroprudential policy in India: experiences and perspectives
Kamalesh C. CHAKRABARTY, Reserve Bank of India

Learning from the history of American macroprudential policy
Douglas J. ELLIOTT, The Brookings Institution

Macroprudential policy and quantitative instruments: a European historical perspective
Anna KELBER and Éric MONNET, Banque de France

– Macroprudential policy interactions and transmission channels

Macroprudential policy beyond banking regulation
Olivier JEANNE and Anton KORINEK, Johns Hopkins University, Department of Economics

Principles for macroprudential regulation
Anil K KASHYAP, University of Chicago Booth School of Business,
Dimitrios P. TSOMOCOS, Said Business School, St Edmund Hall, University of Oxford
and Alexandros VARDOULAKIS, Federal Reserve System

Macroprudential capital tools: assessing their rationale and effectiveness
Laurent CLERC, Banque de France, Alexis DERVIZ, Czech National Bank,
Caterina MENDICINO, Banco de Portugal, Stéphane MOYEN, Deutsche Bundesbank,
Kalin NIKOLOV, Livio STRACCA, European Central Bank,
Javier SUAREZ, CEMFI, and Alexandros VAR DOULA KIS, Federal Reserve System

The housing market: the impact of macroprudential measures in France
Sanvi AVOUYI-DOVI, Rémy LECAT, Banque de France
and Claire LABONNE, Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution

Three criticisms of prudential banking regulations
Vivien LEVY-GARBOUA, Sciences Po and BNP Paribas
and Gérard MAAREK, EDHEC

Macroprudential policy and credit supply cycles
José‑Luis PEYDRÓ, Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra

Interactions between monetary and macroprudential policies
Pamfili ANTIPA and Julien MATHERON, Banque de France

Banque de France’s financial stability report can be found on the CFS FSR page.

Financial Stability Reports from Japan, Korea, South Africa, Brazil, the Netherlands, and Iceland

The following financial stability reports were published and made available recently:

  • Central Bank of Iceland came out with volume 14 of its financial stability report.
  • De Nederlandsche Bank came out with its spring 2014 report.
  • Banco Central do Brasil came out with volume 13 of its report.
  • South African Reserve Bank released the March 2014 Financial Stability Review.
  • The Bank of Korea just came out with its financial stability report today. There is an English version of the executive summary currently. A full English translation will be uploaded shortly.
  • The Bank of Japan came out with the April 2014 Financial System Report. Below is the comprehensive assessment of the financial system from the Bank of Japan website:

    “Japan’s financial system as a whole has been maintaining stability.

    Judging from developments in financial markets and financial institutions’ behavior, there is no indication warning of financial imbalances such as excessively bullish expectations. The volatility of stock prices temporarily increased from the beginning of 2014, but volatility has generally been low in the Japanese government bond (JGB) and foreign exchange markets.

    Capital bases of financial institutions such as banks and shinkin banks have been adequate on the whole, and these institutions have sufficient funding liquidity. Thus, they generally have strong resilience against various economic and financial shocks, as they would maintain their capital adequacy ratios above regulatory levels even under stresses arising in scenarios involving a significant economic downturn and a substantial rise in interest rates. However, attention should be paid to the possibility that the impacts of an economic downturn and an interest rate rise spread to the financial system, depending on the speed and extent of the economic downturn and the rise in interest rates, as well as the factors behind them. Some financial institutions have relatively weak capital bases, and are behind the curve in improving asset quality following the Lehman shock. These institutions need to steadily strengthen their capital.

    Financial intermediation has operated more smoothly than it did at the time of the previous Report.

    Financial institutions have adopted more proactive lending attitudes at home and abroad, and some of them have increasingly taken on risks associated with securities investment, albeit to a small extent. Financial intermediation through financial markets has become prevalent. In these circumstances, financial conditions among firms and households have become more accommodative. Financial institutions’ loans have grown at a faster pace, particularly those to small and medium-sized firms, and these institutions have extended loans to a wider range of industries and regions.

    The recent economic recovery has had positive effects on the profits of financial institutions. The positive effects include an increase in profits related to stock investment, an increase in sales of stock investment trusts, and a decrease in credit costs. However, the core profitability of domestic business operations relating to deposits and loans has remained on a downtrend, mainly due to the continued narrowing of interest rate spreads on loans. Business conditions among regional financial institutions are particularly severe. The decline in core profitability does not immediately affect the stability or functioning of the overall financial system. Nonetheless, the declining trend in core profitability is a challenge that should be resolved because it may constrain financial institutions’ ability to absorb losses and take on risks in the medium to long term.”

  • Financial stability reports can be found here.

    Australian, Hong Kong, and Malaysian Financial Stability Reports Released

    The Reserve Bank of Australia, Hong Kong Monetary Authority, and Bank Negara Malaysia recently released financial stability reports. See:

  • Reserve Bank of Australia Financial Stability Review
  • Hong Kong Monetary Authority March 2014 Half-Yearly Monetary and Financial Stability Report.
  • Bank Negara Malaysia 2013 Financial Stability and Payment Systems Report
  • For more on financial stability, including country reports, work from regulatory bodies, and studies from the IMF and BIS, see here.

    BIS and CFS on Forward Guidance…

    The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) just published a comprehensive and thoughtful paper on “Forward guidance at the zero lower bound” by Andrew Filardo and Boris Hofmann. They conclude that the forward guidance raises a number of significant challenges. How they are managed will ultimately determine the enduring value of this communication tool.

    CFS was early to highlight risks related to the exit from forward guidance. Now that tapering is underway, these issues gain relevance. For further information, please visit:

    The Fed’s Intertemporal Game, September 21, 2012

    Fed’s Current Stance is Tragically Wrong, November 6, 2012

    CFS DM4 Signaled GDP Downward Revision…

    CFS Divisia M4 has proven to be a strong leading indicator of GDP growth. It also provides the most comprehensive real time assessment of the US financial system.

    This morning’s downward revision of Q4 GDP data from 3.2% to 2.4% should come as no surprise. The pace of the economy also demonstrated a slowdown from a 4.1% saar expansion in Q3.

    On the heels of the September CFS monetary release, we wrote Soft Spot for Financial Institutions and Economy – October 16, 2013.

    The weather was clearly not the predominant story in Q4.

    Based on our latest data, the economy will likely continue to soften (see CFS Monetary & Financial Data Release, February 19, 2014 or End of the Free QE Lunch, February 19, 2014 – available on request)